Friendships and Non-Conventional Partnerships
Sasha Roseneil

s.roseneil@leeds.ac.uk

This project focuses on the experiences of care, intimacy and sociability of a sector of the population which has rarely been the explicit subject of social scientific research: adults who are not living with a partner. The theoretical drivers of the research are the sociological literatures on contemporary social transformation, specifically theories of individualisation, detraditionalisation and reflexive modernisation, and the work of Sasha Roseneil on the post-modernisation of the sexual order.

The project has employed a narrative interview methodology, influenced by Hollway and Jefferson’s work on the ‘free association narrative interview’, and grounded in a conceptualisation of interviewees as non-unitary, emotional, psycho-social subjects. 53 Interviews were carried out in three of the CAVA localities - Leeds, Barnsley and Hebden Bridge - which were chosen to offer contrasting contexts in terms of patterns of gender relations, household composition, relationship status and sexual cultures. Second interviews were carried out with 25 of the original 53 in 2003 as part of the Friendship and Non-Conventional Partnership Revisited project, funded by the ESRC.

SOME KEY FINDINGS

Embeddedness in Complex Networks of Intimacy and Care: Far from being the isolated, solitary individuals of much recent theorizing of individualization, the people in this study – none of whom lived with a partner - were enmeshed in complex networks of friends, partners, biological kin, and sometimes, ex-partners and their kin. The vast majority had strong connections and commitments to a range of others.

Prioritizing Friendship: Across a range of lifestyles, ages and sexualities, and across all of the localities, friendship occupied a central place in the personal lives of the interviewees. There was a high degree of reliance on friends, as opposed to biological kin and sexual partners, particularly for the provision of care and support in everyday life.

De-centring Sexual/Love Relationships: There was a strong tendency amongst the interviewees to emphasize the emotional and practical significance of friends over lovers/sexual partners and to be self-consciously seeking to organize their lives so that sexual relationships were not the sole source of support, care and intimacy. A considerable number of interviewees were experimenting with non-conventional forms of partnership, in which they had no intention of co-habiting.

The Importance of Psychological Well-Being: Many of the interviewees had experienced the break-down of a long-term relationship, which resulted in considerable psychological distress, and there were a significant minority who were experiencing long-term psychological ill-health. It was friends far more often than family members who offered support through periods of psychological distress. Consistent attention to practices of care of the self were also particularly important to this group.

Recent publications from the Friendships and Non-Conventional Partnerships project:

  • Roseneil, S. (forthcoming, 2004), ‘Why We Should Care about Friends: An Argument for Queering the Care Imaginary in Social Policy’, Social Policy and Society, Volume 3, Number 4, October.
  • Roseneil, S. (2004) Towards a More Friendly Society: Work, Care and Play in the 21st Century. Paper presented to the Centre for Policy Studies in Education, University of Leeds, 3 June.
  • Roseneil, S. and Budgeon, S. (2004) ‘Cultures of Intimacy and Care Beyond the Family: Personal Life and Social Change in the Early Twenty-First Century’, Current Sociology, 52(2).
  • Roseneil, S. (2003), ‘We’d Rather Be with Friends’, New Statesman, 15 December.