|
|
Career aspirations and succession planning of potential applicants for leadership positions in Australian Catholic schools
Tony d’Arbon
Australian Catholic University, Australia. Email:
t.darbon@mary.acu.edu.au
Jeffrey Dorman
Anglia Polytechnic University, email:
j.dorman@apu.ac.uk
Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Manchester, 15-18 September 2004
Introduction
This paper presents the results of a series of related research studies conducted by Australian Catholic University, begun in 2000, which set out to examine the question of why more persons were not applying for leadership positions in Catholic schools in New South Wales.
The phenomenon of declining numbers of applicants is not restricted to Catholic schools only, and has been widely reported as a matter of international concern. There are reports of a similar lack of ‘appointable’ applicants affecting the filling of principal appointments in schools in general, reflected in studies conducted in Victoria by Lacey (2001), in schools in New Zealand (Rowe, 2000), in the United States (Thompson et al., 2003), in the United Kingdom (Pyke, 2002) and in our own researches conducted by the Flagship for Creative and Authentic Leadership at ACU National (d’Arbon, Duignan & Duncan, 2002). As a result, system administrators at government and non-government school levels, as well as university researchers have been addressing the issue of succession planning and exploring ways of attracting an increasing number of well-qualified and highly motivated applicants to vacant principal positions (Carlin et al, 2003, Thompson et al, 2003). The situation in NSW reflects these concerns and serious and strenuous efforts are being by system administrators and planners for the Catholic schools in that State, to remedy this situation and reverse this trend, (Canavan, 2001).
The initial survey by ACU in NSW, sought responses to the question from over 3000 potential applicants for principal positions, and resulted in the identification of a series of scales of perceptions of disincentives and incentives relating to applications for the position. In addition, the survey quantified a measure of their leadership aspirations, relating to possible applications for a principal position (d’Arbon, Duignan & Duncan, 2002).
The process was repeated in a number of Catholic State jurisdictions and the results are reported below. Before presenting these results, it is useful to consider the context of Catholic education in Australia
What is Catholic education in Australia?
Catholic education is a system based on a specific philosophy with a clearly identified set of values that are reinforced by practice, and role modelling, and supported by the authority of a world-wide organization based in Rome.
Almost since the beginning of European settlement in Australia, Church schools and in particular Catholic schools which are the major contributor to the non-government education system, have been an identifiable component of the Australian cultural landscape and have contributed to the national identity since that time until now.
Contrary to some perceptions, Catholic education and schools systems in Australia do not constitute a seamless group. There are State, diocesan and congregational variations in the leadership preparation and selection procedures in the schools of each of these areas, so that in a survey of this kind, there are local and contextual factors to be taken into account when discussing the results, but the overall picture is a good starting point.
Since many of the non-government, non-Catholic, schools represent systems (The Anglican schools, the Lutheran schools, the Christian schools – although these too are by no means seamless operations) the issues raised in this paper relating to Catholic schools, are of interest to these enterprises too. As an example, the Lutheran Church in Australia (LCA) has embarked upon an important project – the Millennial Principals’ Project (MPP) to identify aspiring leaders in their schools and establish a program that will encourage these persons to develop their leadership skills with a view to taking more senior leadership roles in the future. This process of identifying and encouraging emerging leaders has also been taking place in a project funded by the Australian Government Quality Teaching Program (QTP) and developed by the Australian Principals Associations Professional Development Council (APAPDC) in their new program, Learn: Lead: Succeed. (2004). The program is based on five propositions:
Leadership comes from within;
Leadership is about influencing others;
Leadership develops a rich learning environment;
Leadership builds professionalism and professional capability;
Leadership inspires leadership actions and aspirations in others.
Today I would like to take particular note of Proposition #5:
Leadership inspires leadership actions and aspirations in others
Based on this Proposition, succession planning is the business of everyone engaged in the enterprise and particularly the principal. Under this heading, effective educational leaders ‘are strategic about building leadership in the school, to sustain the school and education generally into the future’ (APAPDC, 2004). It is this proposition that leads into ,a discussion of succession planning
Taken as a whole, Catholic education in Australia is a significant contributor to the national educational enterprise with over 1700 schools, 635,000 students (Approximately 20% of the total school population of the country) and over 39,000 teachers in 22 Dioceses. Hence a continuing supply of well-prepared future leaders for these schools is a matter of ongoing concern for planners in Catholic education.
The future of these schools to be conducted in the manner in which they were originally created, is being influenced by two major factors:
The decline in the number of members of religious congregations from whose membership, principals of Catholic schools were appointed. Their places have now been taken by qualified lay persons; and
The apparent reluctance of teachers in Catholic schools to apply for leadership positions in those schools.
The number of members of religious congregations who had traditionally occupied the leadership positions in Catholic schools, has declined dramatically since the time of the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965). The call to renewal by the Council brought about a radical rethink about the way the Church engaged with the world and one of the effects of this process what that the number of persons entering religious congregations (many of which were dedicated to education) declined, and many members already in the congregations, left the congregations and returned to secular, or lay, life. From a situation in the mid-1960s where the majority of teachers in Catholic schools in Australia were members of religious congregations and the greater majority of school principals were religious, the situation in Australia at the beginning of the 21st century is that there are almost no active religious in the schools and very few are principals (Canavan, 1999).
The leadership of these schools has now passed quietly and smoothly to the lay members of the Catholic community.
Evidence has now emerged that fewer persons are applying for leadership positions in Catholic schools. This was highlighted by annual Diocesan returns of applications for principal positions provided by the Conference of Diocesan Directors of Education NSW (2004), and the figures for 2003 are shown in Table 1.
It should be noted that some of these dioceses are small and have few vacancies – Wilcannia-Forbes had one vacancy and there were two applicants – whereas the much larger dioceses such as Sydney (24 vacancies) and Parramatta (12 vacancies) should especially be noted. The overall ratio for NSW was 3.2 applicants for each advertised principal position.
Table 1.- Principal Vs fos fos fos fos fos fos fos fo:Position, NSW Dioceses, 2003
|
Diocese |
Principal Vacancies |
Ratio Applicants: Position |
Diocese |
Principal Vacancies |
Ratio Applicants: Position |
|
Armidale |
5 |
3.0:1 |
Parramatta |
12 |
3.25:1 |
|
Bathurst |
2 |
1.0:1 |
Sydney |
24 |
2.1:1 |
|
Broken Bay |
4 |
5.3:1 |
Wagga Wagga |
4 |
3.50:1 |
|
Canberra and Goulburn |
7 |
2.29:1 |
Wilcannia Forbes |
1 |
2.0:1 |
|
Lismore |
7 |
6.15:1 |
Wollongong |
3 |
5.34:1 |
|
Maitland-Newcastle |
2 |
4.5:1 |
Source -Conference of Diocesan Directors NSW, 2003
While this is the situation for Catholic schools in New South Wales, there is evidence that the shortage of applicants for principal positions is a problem in government schools as well (Lacey, 2002.
Why is this study so important? At the beginning of the 21st century, there is growing evidence that the role of the school principal in Catholic schools, is becoming less attractive as a career option. There is a shrinking pool of candidates and fewer ‘appointable’ persons are applying for the vacant principal positions in schools than previously. Based on our studies, media reports and the research literature, it is evident that this situation that will only get worse if steps are not taken to seriously address the problem (Di Girolamo 2002, Myton 2002). A recent wage determination by the State Industrial Commission to increase the salary levels of principals and school leaders has been a significant move. It is interesting to note that this move was initiated by the Catholic employers in NSW.
The declining numbers of applicants for principal positions that we identified in our research project into the career aspirations of teachers in Catholic schools was conducted, in the expectation that our results would assist Catholic system administrators and planners to develop succession plans for the future.
What is Succession Planning?
Succession planning is the strategy that an organisation establishes to ensure that within that organization, there is an adequate supply of appropriately trained personnel from which to make a selection, to guarantee a smooth transition of authority when the leader moves of either by retirement or movement to a similar position at another location or to a more attractive position.
For many organisations, this transition often to a person from outside the organisation, provides new skills or a background that brings energy to the situation or organization and for success, the transition is one that is best planned for rather than hoping for the best. At a time when there was a good supply of applicants, there was no need to consider succession planning, but in recent years, this lack of applicants has become a matter of serious concern. When discussing the situation in Catholic schools, Canavan (2001) said:
There is not much evidence that that Catholic schools have embraced succession strategies, apart from the ardent prayer that there will be someone out there somewhere, who will be able to fill the vacancy.
It was from this concern that the Catholic Education Commission of New South Wales (CECNSW) initiated a research project to seek answers to the question of why more persons were not applying for leadership positions in Catholic schools in New South Wales and the results of that enquiry are reported later in this paper.
What is the Importance of Succession Planning in Education?
While many organizations need to have a recruitment policy that looks for certain skills and background in potential applicants for leadership, it is in education that there is a special demand of an understanding of the contexts and needs of pupils, teachers and the communities they serve. It is also a generally accepted position that school principals come from the ranks of school teachers and that education is, like the majority of human service organizations, a life-long career pathway (Holloway, 2000).
The importance of succession planning for Catholic schools and indeed for any faith-based schooling system is the need for persons who not only have the requisite capabilities to be principals, but also have the confidence of the faith group that they have the necessary background, motivation and commitment to ensure the values of the system are faithfully transmitted. If not, there is the possibility of a situation, similar to that predicted for the UK (Pyke, 2002) where he claims that: ‘Catholic schools may move towards a model of having a Catholic superintendent directing strategy for a group of schools while the day to day running of individual schools is in the hands of a Christian non-Catholic’.
The concerns of system administrators and planners was appreciated by the industrial group representing teachers in non-Government schools, the Independent Education Union (IEU). The IEU welcomed a call from the Sydney CEO for primary principals to identify future leaders in their schools, but said that while succession planning was important there were a range of other issues stopping people from considering applying for principals’ jobs.
The Union said that concerns raised by the CEO were consistent with data from ACU research and from the IEU's principals' workload survey in 2001. Statistics showed 26 primary assistant principal positions advertised by the Archdiocese in 2001 yielded just 38 eligible applicants, averaging 1.6 per position. Of the 16 primary principals positions advertised there were only 34 eligible applicants, an average of 2.1 per position advertised.
The IEU said it was pleased by the CEO's initiative to generate successors from within schools, but said there were also major issues that needed to be addressed regarding workloads and expectations placed on principals and assistant principals. The union said it is these issues that had the greatest impact on potential applicants' perceptions of the roles.
To give out enquiries focus, there are three questions to be addressed:
What is the depth of the pool of potential applicants for the position of principal?
How many in the pool of potential applicants are interested in applying for a principal position?
What are the special needs of Catholic schools that makes this such an important question for them?
So let us look at the research data and have some reflections on what it means and finally let us have a look at some ways of addressing the issue.
The Research
The original research set out to study reasons why more persons were not applying for leadership positions in Catholic schools in New South Wales. An instrument was developed to examine the perceptions of those persons who were in the pool of likely to apply for a principal position and examine their perceptions of the disincentives likely to be considered when the time came for them to apply or not apply. This was whether or not the system would consider them ‘appointable’.
The methodology, survey instrument and statistical analysis, proved to be robust and the results created a series of benchmarks and structures to enable the study to be extended to other Catholic education systems in other States in Australia. (Dorman & d’Arbon, 2003). The survey was then conducted in Catholic schools in Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania (The VSAT Project). The subsequent report confirmed the results of the NSW study, although with local and contextual variations. The scope of this study was extended by inviting principals and leaders of Catholic education systems in those States, to respond to questions relating to the preparation and professional development of principals (Carlin et al., 2003).
The study was then extended to Catholic schools in the Northern Territory where the geography and nature of the State meant that the schools are fewer and more scattered and a different set of results might be expected, as indeed they were. (d’Arbon, 2003).
As a result of these researches, Catholic Education Offices (CEOs) around Australia took note of these results and a number began to develop strategies to create a culture of leadership and identify talented staff members for future higher level and broader responsibilities. This has led to the introduction of professional and executive development programs that would provide for career path definition and an anticipated increase in the number of ‘appointable’ applicants.
The survey instruments for each aspect of the overall project, as well as dealing with the incentives and disincentives perceived about the principal role, also contained a question that invited a response to the career aspirations of those being surveyed, with respect to the principalship. The aspiration question was modelled on research conducted by James and Whiting (1998) in the UK, and the responses to this question from each of the State projects, are the subject of this paper.
Career Aspirations
The broad results of the leadership aspiration question are given below (Table 2).
Using a modified James and Whiting model, three groups of respondents were identified:
The result that 53 percent of those who responded to the survey were unwilling to apply for a principal position, (the Unavailed and the Settlers), was the first time that any reliable figure had been put onto a situation that many had felt was the case but not to any detailed extent. There were diocesan variations and responses varied according to gender and position in the school hierarchy, but overall, there was a significant data to provide benchmarks for reflection and strategic planning.
These results have been subjected to statistical analysis using cross-tabulations and a number of these tables are given below.
At the same time, other writers have made a special study of gender implications of the aspirations of similar groups (Lacey 2004).
Table 2 – Career Aspirations of all Respondents
|
Career Aspirations |
Frequency |
Percent |
Group |
|
|
Unavailed Aspirants |
I have applied for a principalship in the past but will not do so in future |
35 |
3.5 |
Unwilling Respondents |
|
Settlers |
I have never applied and do not intend applying |
498 |
49.4 |
|
|
Unpredictable |
I have note yet applied but am unsure if I will in the future |
51 |
5.1 |
Unsure Respondents |
|
Uncertain |
I would only apply for a principalship if it was in a suitable location |
116 |
11.5 |
|
|
Potential Aspirants |
I have not yet applied but do envisage applying in the future |
270 |
26.8 |
Willing Respondents |
|
Active Aspirants |
I am actively seeking a principalship |
38 |
3.7 |
|
|
Total |
1008 |
100 |
A similar analysis focused on ‘school type by leadership aspiration’. The findings are set out in Table 3 below, and they indicate little variation in leadership aspiration between primary and secondary senior leaders.
TABLE 3: School-type by Leadership Aspiration Cross-Tabulation
|
Leadership Aspiration (row percentage) |
|||
|
School type |
Unwilling to apply |
Unsure about applying |
Willing to apply |
|
Primary |
46.3 |
17.9 |
35.8 |
|
Secondary |
42.4 |
24.3 |
33.3 |
|
Total sample |
44.6 |
21.2 |
34.2 |
A cross-tabulation of ‘gender by school-type by leadership aspiration’ was performed to confirm the results set out in Tables 9 and 10. These results are shown in Table 4.
TABLE 4: Gender by School Type by Leadership Aspiration Cross-Tabulation
|
Leadership Aspiration (row percentage) |
|||
|
Gender & School Type |
Unwilling to apply |
Unsure about applying |
Willing to apply |
|
Male |
|||
|
Primary |
12.5 |
26.8 |
60.7 |
|
Secondary |
34.2 |
30.1 |
35.6 |
|
Male total sample |
24.6 |
29.1 |
46.3 |
|
Female |
|||
|
Primary |
58.0 |
14.7 |
27.3 |
|
Secondary |
52.6 |
17.5 |
29.8 |
|
Female total sample |
56.2 |
16.7 |
27.1 |
TABLE 5 : Senior Leaders Career Aspirations regarding Applications for Principalship-VSAT Project
|
Career Aspirations |
Frequency |
Percent |
Group |
|
|
Unavailed Aspirants |
I have applied for a principalship in the past but will not do so in future |
24 |
6.1 |
Unwilling Respondents |
|
Settlers |
I have never applied and do not intend applying |
141 |
35.6 |
|
|
Unpredictable |
I have note yet applied but am unsure if I will in the future |
33 |
8.3 |
Unsure Respondents |
|
Uncertain |
I would only apply for a principalship if it was in a suitable location |
63 |
15.9 |
|
|
Potential Aspirants |
I have not yet applied but do envisage applying in the future |
109 |
27.5 |
Willing Respondents |
|
Active Aspirants |
I am actively seeking a principalship |
26 |
6.6 |
|
|
Total |
396 |
100 |
What does the research say about future numbers?
In addition to the low percentage of ‘willing’ respondents, here are reports of teacher supply and demand that show that there is a developing shortage of teachers and consequently a diminished supply of potential applicants for principal positions.(Preston, 1998, MCEETYA, 2003). In addition there is an increasing leakage of qualified teachers and principals from the schools (Ingersoll, 2001, Butt, 2003), making it imperative that suitable succession planning strategies be implemented.
Extensive research into the future numbers of teachers in Australian schools, including both government and non-government (MCEETYA 2003), indicate that the national market for teachers remains broadly in balance. However, both the government and non-government sectors continue to report recruiting difficulties in some locations and in a number of teaching specialisations. The data available suggest that in the period ahead (post-2004) is likely to face increasing shortages of teachers due to age-based retirement. Hence the need for strategic planning to increase the aspirations of potential applicants for leadership positions in schools.
Conclusion
Through the surveys into leadership succession and career aspirations being conducted by the Flagship for Creative and Authentic Leadership at Australian Catholic University, the overall picture of the leadership aspirations of leaders in Catholic schools, and the perceptions of incentives and disincentives of the persons applying for principal positions, is being built up and evaluated.
Now that there are data from a number of sources to indicate the numbers and proportions of persons willing to apply, and these numbers appear to be low, despite this, the situation for the future leadership of Catholic schools in Australia remains hopeful. There is now a growing awareness in Australia, of the special need for an ongoing supply of high quality leaders for these schools and the necessity for a strong formation program to ensure that the special nature of Catholic leadership is understood and fostered by appropriate formation and support programs. The terms leadership succession and succession planning are now firmly embedded in the vocabulary and practices of the strategic planners in the CEOs in Australia. In this way they will ensure that Catholic school of the future will thrive under the direction of an ongoing supply of well-qualified and highly motivated Catholic educational leaders.
References
Australian Principals Associations Professional Development Council (2004). Learn: Lead: Succeed. A resource to support the building of leadership in Australian schools. Adelaide: APAPDC
Butt, N. (2003). Why I quite teaching. London: The Spectator (June 7) 292, Issue 9122, p.18
Canavan, K. (2001). Leadership succession planning: Growing future leaders for Catholic education – A plan of action. Sydney: Catholic Education Office, Sydney
Canavan, K. (1999). The transformation of Catholic schools in Australia. Journal of Religious Education 47,(1), 19-24
Carlin, P., D’Arbon, T., Dorman, J., Duignan, P. & Neidhart, H. (2003). Leadership succession for Catholic schools in Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania. Final Report, April 2003. Sydney: ACU National
D’Arbon, T. (2004). Future principals for schools of the future. Practising Administrator 26 (1) 4-43
D’Arbon, T., Duignan, P. & Duncan, D.J. (2002). Planning for the futurn, Tn, Tn, Tn, Tn, Tn, Tn, Tn, Tralian study. Journal of Educational Administration, 40 (5) 468-480
Di Giorolamo, R. (2002). No takers for the hottest seat in the schoolhouse. The Australian, May 13, p.8
Dorman, J. & d’Arbon, T. (2003). Assessing impediments to leadership succession in Australian Catholic schools. School Leadership and Management 23 (1) 25-40
Holloway, J.H. (2000). Pathways to the principalship. Educational Leadership 57, (8)
Ingersoll, R.M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Education Research Journal, 38 (Fall),59-63
James, C. & Whiting, D. (1998). The career perspectives of Deputy Headteachers in the UK. Educational Management and Administration 26, 4, 353-362
Lacey, K. (2001). Succession planning in education. Australian Council for Educational Administration. Hot Topics, No.4 September
Lacey, K. (2002). Succession planning in education. www.apapdc.edu.au/2002/downloads/2002/Lacey_succesion_planning.pdf
Lacey, K. (2004). Women in teaching: Factors that impact on their leadership aspirations. IARTV Seminar Series #131. Melbourne: Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria
Ministerial Council on Employment, Education and Training (MCEETYA) (2003). Demands and supply of primary and secondary teachers in Australia. Online Available http://www.curriculum.edu.au/mceetya/public/demand.htm
Myton, D. (2002). Research to examine decline in principals. Education Review/Campus Review. April/May, p.12
Preston, B. (2000). Teacher supply and demand to 2004: Updated projections. Canberra: Australian Council of Deans of Education
Pyke, N. (2002). Counting Heads. The Tablet (9 February, 18-20)
Rowe, R. (2000). Shortage of School principals looming. New Zealand Education Review, January 14.
Thompson, P.,Blackmore, J.,Sachs, J. & Tregenza, K (2003). High stakes principalship – sleeplesss nights, heart attacks and sudden death accountabilities: Reading media representations of the United States principal shortage. Australian Journal of Education 47 (2) 118-132
|
Disincentive |
Remedial Action |
|
Impact on personal and family life Respondents perceive external environment to be unfriendly Expectation that the principal is the articulator of the explicit religious identity of the school Flawed nature of the interview process Excessive demands for accountability Lacked the necessary expertise for the position. Gender bias Forfeit close relationships with children and colleagues. |