In its report, the National Committee is
making in the order of one hundred recommendations
covering the whole of the United Kingdom (UK). In
endorsing the majority of the National Committee's
recommendations; the recommendations we, as the Scottish
Committee, are making, serve as additional proposals or
as amplification to fit the National Committee's
recommendations to the distinctive Scottish context. It
is, therefore, essential to the context of our
recommendations that readers have an understanding of the
National Committee's proposals.New Scottish qualifications framework
Recommendation 1
We recommend to providers of higher education programmes
in Scotland, the Quality Assurance Agency, the Scottish
Qualifications Authority and the Scottish Advisory
Committee on Credit and Access that they should together
consider and adopt an integrated qualifications framework
based around level of study and Scottish Credit
Accumulation and Transfer Scheme credit points.
Scottish
higher education qualifications
Recommendation 2
We recommend to all higher education institutions that
360 credit-point Bachelors degrees should become more
widely available and that they should begin to develop or
extend their provision in this area, with the support and
assistance of the Scottish Higher Education Funding
Council.
Recommendation 3
We recommend to higher education institutions that they
should develop wider and more diverse programmes at
honours level.
Recommendation 4
We recommend to professional bodies and institutions that
they should together formally consider how their
requirements could be embedded within the qualifications
framework, in discussion with the Quality Assurance
Agency and the Scottish Qualifications Authority as
appropriate.
Admissions
Recommendation 5
We recommend to the Committee of Scottish Higher
Education Principals, the Association of Scottish
Colleges, the Scottish Qualifications Authority, the
Scottish Advisory Committee on Credit and Access, The
Scottish Office Education and Industry Department, the
Association of Directors of Education, school
headteachers and other interested parties that they
should give urgent attention and consideration to
achieving better value for money from the Scottish Sixth
Year by:
- evolving a
meaningful and credit-rated curriculum for
the Advanced Higher;
- evolving a
meaningful curriculum for non-Advanced Higher
students
so that both can be
fitted meaningfully and usefully into the framework of
qualifications.
Recommendation 6
We recommend to higher education providers that they
should clearly specify their requirements for
combinations of A levels which will lead to entry with
advanced standing within the new qualifications
framework.
Recommendation 7
We recommend to further education colleges and higher
education institutions that they should actively
collaborate to enhance and publicise access and
articulation routes into degree programmes for students
at further education colleges.
Teaching,
quality and standards
Recommendation 8
We recommend to higher education institutions that they
should, on behalf of their staff, establish or seek
access to programmes accredited by the proposed Institute
for Learning and Teaching that support teaching
excellence. Institutions should encourage new and
existing staff, including higher education teachers in
the further education sector, to join the Institute.
Recommendation 9
We recommend to the Scottish Higher Education Funding
Council that, for as long as Teaching Quality Assessment
remains the main quality assessment mechanism in
operation in Scotland, a review cycle of not more than
six years should be in place.
Recommendation 10
We recommend to the Scottish Higher Education Funding
Council and the Quality Assurance Agency that they should
meet, as soon as practical, to begin negotiations that
will ensure that the criteria to support Scotland's
inclusion in the Agency are met at an early date.

Research
Recommendation 11
We recommend to the Scottish Higher Education Funding
Council that it should identify how it might encourage
and facilitate research collaboration within its funding
streams.
Recommendation 12
We recommend to the Scottish Higher Education Funding
Council that it should give further consideration to how,
and on what basis, collaborative research centres might
be best facilitated and organised in Scotland.
Recommendation 13
We recommend to the Scottish Higher Education Funding
Council and the Research Councils that they should, as
appropriate, make available additional funding to ensure
that outstanding researchers, irrespective of location,
have access to research facilities.
Recommendation 14
We recommend to higher education institutions that they
should identify and establish links with industry to
foster and facilitate work-based research training. These
links should enable industry staff to gain high quality
postgraduate qualifications through in-house research
projects.
Recommendation 15
We recommend that the Secretary of State for Scotland
should consider filling the post of Chief Scientific
Adviser for Scotland. One of his or her primary
responsibilities would be to identify and develop, where
possible, from the diverse research base in Scotland, an
integrated strategy for Scottish research.
Strengthening economic links
Recommendation 16
We recommend that the Confederation of British Industry
(Scotland), the Scottish Council Development and Industry
and other employer associations should urge their members
to give consideration to increasing provision of
sponsorship opportunities and work experience for
students.
Recommendation 17
We recommend to higher education providers and employers
that they should collaborate to develop more sponsorship
and work experience opportunities which provide real
benefit to both students and employers.
Recommendation 18
We recommend to The Scottish Office Education and
Industry Department that it should look in detail at the
scope for developing additional work placement
opportunities on the Shell Technology Enterprise
Programme model using funds already channelled for
support of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises.
Infrastructure
Recommendation 19
We recommend to the Confederation of British Industry
(Scotland), Chairmen and Chief Executives of Scottish
companies and other organisations that they should be
responsive to institutional needs for high quality lay
members for their governing bodies.
Recommendation 20
We recommend to the four Scottish ancient universities
and to the Government that the office of Rector should no
longer be linked to the Chairmanship of the University
Court, and that the appropriate legislation should be
enacted to support this change in institutional
governance.
Recommendation 21
We recommend to institutions that they should develop
ideas for improvement in performance through better use
of facilities and resources, and that this should be
implemented both within and between institutions. Staff
who contribute useful ideas should be rewarded.
Recommendation 22
We recommend to institutions that they should develop a
culture where each individual member of staff is aligned
to the need to assist the organisation in becoming as
efficient and effective as possible.
Recommendation 23
We recommend to the Government that the appropriate
legislation should be enacted or invoked to establish two
separate funding councils - one for further education and
one for higher education - each with a separate chairman
but under a single organisation and with a single chief
executive.
Recommendation 24
We recommend to the Government that the proposed funding
council for further education should have responsibility
for funding all provision leading to qualifications
offered by the Scottish Qualifications Authority.
Recommendation 25
We recommend to the Government that the proposed funding
council for higher education should have responsibility
for all provision offered by higher education
institutions and degree provision wherever it is offered,
including degree provision in the further education
colleges and, when it comes on stream, the University of
the Highlands and Islands Project.
Recommendation 26
We recommend to the new Quality Assurance Agency that it
should be responsible for assuring the quality of all
programmes offered within higher education institutions
and all degree-level provision wherever it is delivered.
Recommendation 27
We recommend to the Secretary of State for Scotland that
a new body - the Scottish Forum for Higher Education -
should be established to advise the Secretary of State on
the strategic direction of higher education in Scotland.
Funding
Recommendation 28
We recommend to the Student Awards Agency for Scotland
that it should consider how it might adopt a differential
funding methodology for the Access Funds so that
resources are better targeted towards those institutions
where the students' need is greatest.
Recommendation 29
We recommend to the Secretary of State for Scotland that,
if a graduate contribution is introduced, the Secretary
of State should ensure that the contribution from
Scottish graduates for qualifications gained in Scotland
is equitable with the contribution for comparable
qualifications gained elsewhere in the UK.

|