departmentUniversity of Leeds Logo

 

 

Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics

No. 9, 2002

Edited by Diane Nelson

CONTENTS

Department of Linguistics and Phonetics

1.      The Pollyanna Principle in English and French lexis:  Some results and issues of methodology

Nigel Armstrong & Clare Hogg

Abstract - Full text as pdf file (1,659K)

 

2.      Intertextuality as discourse strategy: The case of no-confidence debates in Thailand

Savitri Gadavanij

AbstractFull text as pdf file (345K) 

 

3.      Alternating unaccusative verbs in Slovene

Sabina Grahek

Abstract  Full text as pdf file (340K) 

             

4.      S-adverbs in Icelandic and the feature theory of adverbs

      Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson

      Abstract          Full text as pdf file (335K)   

 

5.      /r/ Production in English and Arabic bilingual and monolingual speakers

Ghada Khattab

Abstract          Full text as pdf file (2,801K)

 

6.      Prelinguistic primitives and the evolution of argument structure: Evidence from Specific Language Impairment

      Diane Nelson & Vesna Stojanovik

Abstract          Full text as pdf file (291K)   

     

7.      A study of dialect levelling in some fifteenth-century Yorkshire documents    

Reiko Takeda

Abstract          Full text as pdf file (680K)   

 

8.      Evaluation of a technique for improving the mapping of multiple speakers’ vowel spaces in the F1 ~ F2 plane     

Dominic Watt and Anne Fabricius

Abstract          Full text as pdf file (359K)   

 

9.      Speech rhythm production in three German-English bilingual families

Nicole Whitworth

Abstract          Full text as pdf file (596K)   


Abstracts

 

The Pollyanna Principle in English and French lexis:
some results and issues of methodology

 

Nigel Armstrong & Clare Hogg

 

Abstract

This article reports on a comparison of variable lexis in English and French through a questionnaire study. The study was designed to investigate the different rates at which young speakers of English and French introduce non-standard adjectives that have negative and positive reference (e.g. ‘pathetic’ and ‘cool’). The research issues studied are twofold. We wished to test the validity of the ‘Pollyanna Principle’, a concept in linguistic pragmatics adapted from the ‘Pollyanna Hypothesis’ of psychology, and designed to account for the preference on the part of speakers for avoiding and/or mitigating negative terms and expressions. We examine critically here the hypothesis suggested by I. Opie and P. Opie (1959) that negative terms used by children and adolescents tend to be relatively stable, in contrast to the rapid turnover of terms of approval. Against this however, more recent research into sociolinguistic variation in French suggests that contrary to what has been reported for many languages (notably English, the most intensively studied language from a sociolinguistic viewpoint), variation in the lexis of French is more prominent than in its pronunciation (Armstrong 2001). If true, this might imply that French speakers coin lexical items (both negative and positive) more frequently than speakers of English. The objective of the study was therefore to test the cross-linguistic validity of the Pollyanna Principle, by comparing reported rates of lexical innovation in English and French. The results presented here suggest that Pollyanna does indeed have validity across the two languages, but that recent social mutations in the direction of greater informality have made possible the readier expression of negative emotions, especially through the increased acceptability of taboo terms.

 

Back to top

Full text as pdf file (1,659K)

 


INTERTEXTUALITY AS DISCOURSE STRATEGY: THE CASE OF

NO-CONFIDENCE DEBATES IN THAILAND

Savitri Gadavanij

Abstract

The discourse of Thai parliamentary no-confidence debates is intended to be formal in nature, and is defined as such by the constitution and relevant parliamentary regulations. However, the reality of this ‘parliamentary’ discourse does not always meet this idea. There is evidence of mixed genres and the combination of the language user’s (henceforth S) voice and other’s throughout the discourse of the debate. The combination of genres and voices in the discourse represents two levels of intertextuality (Chouliaraki and Fairclough, 1999: 49).

 

This paper argues that intertextuality is part of the in-built structure of the no-confidence debate discourse which operates in the face of three competing conjunctures: the debate’s purpose, its multiple audiences and its code of behaviour. Intertextuality reflects the struggle of the members of the Thai parliament to balance three purposes: the desire of highly partisan debaters to cause maximum damage to the opposing side, their need to seek public support and the need to stay within the parliamentary codes of behaviour. In this light, intertextuality can be seen as a strategy enabling MPs to produce a kind of discourse that can serve these competing social and political purposes, and to do so within the constraints of its three conjunctures.

 

Back to top

Full text as pdf file (345K)

 


ALTERNATING UNACCUSATIVE VERBS IN SLOVENE

 

Sabina Grahek

 

Abstract

According to the Unaccusative Hypothesis (Perlmutter 1978) not all intransitive verbs share the same syntactic and argument structure, and can therefore be divided into two classes, unergative verbs and unaccusative verbs. This paper shows that in Slovene, like in many other languages, there exists a special class of unaccusatives which can participate in the causative alternation under certain conditions (when an externally caused event can come about spontaneously). These verbs always come in two variants, transitive (Peter odpre okno ‘Peter opens the window’) and intransitive (Okno se odpre ‘The window opens’). The comparison with other languages reveals that Slovene alternating causative verbs exhibit all the crucial properties of this class of verbs. In Slovene the detransitivisation of causative verbs can be indicated by the cliticisation of the morpheme se (odpreti – odpreti se ‘open’), by the change of the vowel ‑i‑ into ‑e‑ in the infinitive stem (počrniti – počrneti ‘blacken’) or by the use of identical form of the verb (zmrzniti – zmrzniti ‘freeze’). The data, however, provide evidence that only reflexivisation is still productive in modern Slovene, while the other two processes are no longer employed to form new intransitive verbs from transitive causative verbs.

 

Back to top

Full text as pdf file (340K)   

 


S-ADVERBS IN ICELANDIC AND THE FEATURE THEORY OF ADVERBS

 

Jóhannes Gísli Jónsson

 

 

Abstract

This paper examines the distribution of five classes of S-adverbs in Icelandic and concludes that the adjunction theory of adverbs is superior to Cinque's  (1999) feature theory in accounting for the data. In particular, the relative freedom in the order of S-adverbs and the thematic subject in the double subject construction is expected if the subject occupies a unique position and the adverbs can adjoin recursively to maximal projections preceding or following the subject. By contrast, the feature theory necessitates an excessive functional architecture with multiple subject positions in between the adverb-related projections and this is both theoretically problematic and unmotivated.

The ordering relations among S-adverbs in Icelandic are also discussed in this paper and shown to be much freer than the feature theory would predict. Conjunctive adverbs are especially problematic as they do not behave as specifiers of any functional projection.

 

Back to top

Full text as pdf file (381K)

 


/r/ PRODUCTION IN ENGLISH AND ARABIC BILINGUAL AND MONOLINGUAL SPEAKERS

 

Ghada Khattab

 

Abstract

This paper reports an analysis of /r/ production by English-Arabic bilingual children. It addresses the question of whether the bilingual develops one phonological system or two by calling for a refinement of the notion of a system using insights from recent phonetic and sociolinguistic work on variability in speech. The bilingual subjects that were chosen for the study are three Lebanese children aged 5, 7 and 10, all born and raised in Yorkshire, England. Monolingual friends of the same age were chosen as controls, and the parents of all bilingual and monolingual children were also taped to obtain a detailed assessment of the sound patterns available in the subjects’ environment. The bilinguals were taped in different language sessions with different interlocutors. /r/ was chosen due to the existence of different patterns for its production in English and Arabic that vary according to contextual and dialectal factors. Results show that (i) the bilinguals have developed separate /r/ production patterns for each of their languages that are similar to those of monolinguals, and (ii) the interaction between their two languages is mainly restricted to the bilingual mode and is a sign of their developing sociolinguistic competence.

 

Back to top

Full text as pdf file (2,801K)

 


PRELINGUISTIC PRIMITIVES AND THE EVOLUTION OF

ARGUMENT STRUCTURE:

EVIDENCE FROM SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT

 

Diane Nelson & Vesna Stojanovik

 

 

Abstract

Recent research in the evolution of language has focused on a search for prelinguistic cognitive abilities which may have been co-opted by the emerging language faculty. One recent suggestion is that subitizing, or the primate and infant human ability to identify and keep track of small sets of participants without counting, may have played a role in the evolution of syntax (Hurford in press, Hauser et al 2000). If this is indeed the case, we may expect to find populations with linked impairments both in the processing of syntactic argument structure and their ability to subitize. This paper reports the results of a pilot study which seeks to test this hypothesis. A small cohort of children diagnosed with Specific Language Impairment and showing syntactic deficits were tested for their ability to subitize. The results for the group as a whole were inconclusive, but one of the subjects showed marked difficulties with both the syntactic and subitizing tasks. We conclude that while further experiments are needed with a larger subject pool, the initial results may support a neural (and therefore evolutionary) link between the processing of argument structure and the ability to subitize.

 

Back to top

Full text as pdf file (294K)

 


A STUDY OF DIALECT LEVELLING IN SOME FIFTEENTH-CENTURY YORKSHIRE DOCUMENTS

 

Reiko Takeda

 

 

Abstract

The present paper analyses some patterns of linguistic change found in fifteenth-century Yorkshire documents. It reconsiders the widely held view that the loss of dialectally marked features in written English during this period was the result of language standardisation implemented by the Chancery. This paper presents an alternative view, suggesting that variation and change of the language in the selected documents demonstrate the occurrence of dialect levelling as a result of dialect contact rather than an imitating of a ‘standard’ model of English.

 

Back to top

Full text as pdf file (686K)

 


EVALUATION OF A TECHNIQUE FOR IMPROVING THE MAPPING OF MULTIPLE SPEAKERS’ VOWEL SPACES IN THE F1 ~ F2 PLANE

 

Dominic Watt & Anne Fabricius

 

Abstract

We evaluate a vowel formant normalisation technique that allows direct visual and statistical comparison of vowel triangles for multiple speakers of different sexes, by calculating for each speaker a ‘centre of gravity’ S in the F1 ~ F2 plane. S is calculated on the basis of formant frequency measurements taken for the so-called ‘point’ vowel [i], the average F1 and F2 for the vowel category with the highest average F1 (for English, usually the vowel of the TRAP or START lexical sets), and hypothetical minimal F1 and F2 values (coordinates we label [uÈ]) extrapolated from the other two points. Expression of individual F1 and F2 measurements as ratios of the value of S for that formant permits direct mapping of different speakers’ vowel triangles onto one another, resulting in marked improvements in agreement in vowel triangle (a) area and (b) overlap, as compared to similar mappings attempted using linear Hz scales and the z (Bark) scale.

 

Back to top

Full text as pdf file (359K)

 


SPEECH RHYTHM PRODUCTION IN THREE GERMAN-ENGLISH BILINGUAL FAMILIES

 

Nicole Whitworth

 

Abstract

Rarely, if ever, in studies of the acquisition of more than one phonology has the speech of all the members of a bilingual family been examined within the same experiment. Rather it has been tacitly assumed that the parents’ speech complies with the phonetic or phonological characteristics of their respective native languages. For example, the impact of the parents’ second language on their native language, and regional and/or idiosyncratic features of the parents’ speech have not been taken into account, when evaluating the children’s production. However, these possible discrepancies from the standard pronunciation might explain the children’s performance, particularly in the non-dominant language. An examination of the speech of parents and children will also provide the opportunity to compare L2 phonology with (developing) bilingual phonology. The experiment reported here compares the speech rhythm of utterances produced by the members of three German-English bilingual families. The children and adults were recorded during a story-telling task. The recordings were then analysed auditorily and acoustically. Rhythmic variability (Pairwise Variability Index) was calculated for intervocalic and vocalic intervals of the children’s utterances in both languages. The results show that bilingual children are in fact aware of fine-grained rhythmic variability in the linguistic input they receive, and are able to produce corresponding patterns which are, however, not necessarily identical with adult targets.

 

Back to top

Full text as pdf file (596K)

 

 

 


Department of Linguistics and Phonetics - University of Leeds - Leeds - LS2 9JT
Email: linguistics@leeds.ac.uk | Tel: +44 (0) 113 343 3563 | Fax: +44 (0) 113 343 3566

Copyright and Legal | Accessibility | Privacy | Freedom of information
Copyright © 2006 University of Leeds