You have javascript disabled in your browser. We recommend turning it on for a better experience on this site.


Board-level ethics must be systematic, report finds

The key to making ethical decisions is to be methodical, says the National Inquiry into Organisational Ethical Decision-Making in the NHS.

The report is essential reading for NHS boards and senior managers. Government reforms to increase public access to information are set to raise the risk of challenges to trust decisions.

The inquiry, led by the Centre for Innovation in Health Management at the University of Leeds (CIHM), was based on one-to-one interviews with NHS managers.

One manager described ethics as "that real hard slog of thinking things through". The inquiry aims to take the slog out of ethical decision-making, and provides a checklist for immediate implementation.

Recommendations include:

· Decisions affecting large groups should not receive less time than those affecting one patient

· Separate values from data. Managers are often more comfortable with data, believing that enough data will reveal the 'right' answer. In fact, there will always be a value base to apparently 'right' answers so bring those values to the surface

· Define the values you have identified - the inquiry helps with this in a section on key value concepts in healthcare

· Use these principles with real decisions and the process will get easier

· Ethical decisions are better for staff and patients.

The report adds: "Time is not always apportioned rationally. A couple's request for a third round of IVF might be agonised over. Halving a budget which affects many people is less emotionally vivid but needs the same consideration."

CIHM associate and co-author Martin Fischer said: "With open access to information, contestability is going to increase dramatically. If you follow the steps in the inquiry this is a way of reducing the amount time spent on challenges to your decision."

He added: "Our ability to make decisions that deeply engage with ethics is fundamental to public services - this inquiry helps remind us to do it rigorously, to make it core business rather than a one-off. Almost all managers are working in the NHS because of a deep public sector ethos. This inquiry is way for them to re-ground themselves in those values."

The inquiry recommends that trusts start using the principles immediately in real decisions, as values only become clear in action. Jim Baxter, a researcher at Leeds University's Interdisciplinary Ethics Applied Centre for Excellence and co-author of the report, said: "You don't have a choice about making ethical decisions - you're doing it already. The inquiry is about knowing how to apply values in practice. There's not very much point sitting around pontificating about what your value set is - it only becomes apparent during decisions. The decisions themselves are complex, but there are certain approaches you can take that help them become clearer."

CIHM director and report author Becky Malby said: "Sometimes in trusts, straightforward decisions like car parking get amplified into complex decisions because it makes the board feel good - it's something they can do. Whereas deeply complex decisions, like the line between what is social care and what the family should do, get simplified.

"But it's not daunting - getting to grips with ethics and values can liberate decision-making and make it easier. People find it hard because they don't have a shared understanding of how to deal with ethics. Without working through the ethics, decision-making becomes frustrating - people wonder why their view has not been recognized. The eventual decision and resulting policy isn't congruous, it doesn't add up for people who are using the service or for staff.  Organisations which have worked really hard on ethical decision-making reap the benefits with decisions their staff can understand and can implement."

Notes to Editors:

This press release relates to the National Inquiry into Organisational Ethical Decision Making which will be published on February 3, 2012. The report can be found at www.cihm.leeds.ac.uk or at http://bit.ly/cihmethics

For further information and/or a copy of the report please contact Juliet Brown or Becky Malby at CIHM on 0113 3433482 / 0113 343 5599 or j.l.brown@leeds.ac.uk. / j.l.paglia@leeds.ac.uk

CIHM are offering workshops to support Boards and senior management teams with their ethical decision making. Please contact above for further information.

The Centre for Innovation in Health Management:

The Centre for Innovation in Health Management (CIHM) is a Centre within the Business School at the University of Leeds. The School's strength in health and public service leadership, organisational development and change is driven by the CIHM as an impact arm of the school.

At CIHM we are passionate about improving public services and also about leadership and systems. Our activities include applied research, medical leadership development, board development, culture change programmes, leadership development of top leaders in the public sector and in particular the NHS.

CIHM is a not for profit organisation, with a membership of 700 health leaders (community leaders, doctors, third sector, mainstream NHS) in the UK and 100 International health leaders. Our fees support our work in and for the NHS and wider public services.

University of Leeds

The 2008 Research Assessment Exercise showed the University of Leeds to be the UK's eighth biggest research powerhouse. The university is one of the largest higher education institutions in the UK and a member of the Russell Group of research-intensive universities. Its vision is to secure a place among the world's top 50 universities by 2015. www.leeds.ac.uk

For further information: 

Please contact the University of Leeds Press Office on +44 (0)113 343 4031 or email pressoffice@leeds.ac.uk

Back to the top