You have javascript disabled in your browser. We recommend turning it on for a better experience on this site.


Employee co-operative or conventional business - which is best?

Employee co-operative or conventional business - which is best?

Wisdom has it that employee-owned firms are small, undercapitalised and less efficient than conventional firms. The success of the John Lewis Partnership, the story goes, must be the exception.

But the first comprehensive study on the subject has found that employee-owned firms in Europe are often larger than conventional businesses and at least as productive, and that traditionally-run companies could often be more efficient if they operated more like co-operatives. 

Employee-owned companies differ from conventional businesses in a variety of ways.  Staff typically elect senior management and vote at AGMs, and receive the profits that are not re-invested in the company.  They normally have a say in how the business operates, by proposing ways to improve production or being involved in strategic decisions. 

Economists at Leeds University Business School, Panthéon-Assas Paris-II University and Spain's Mondragon University looked at 7,000 French companies, including around 500 workers' cooperatives, from 10 different industries in manufacturing, construction and services. 

The report, Productivity, capital and labour in labour-managed and conventional firms, compared productivity, company size, investment and growth at the businesses during a period of moderate growth, 1987-1990, and another that included the 1990s recession, 1989-1996. 

The team, led by Virginie Pérotin, Professor of Economics at Leeds University Business School, found substantial differences in how the businesses organise production of goods and services, but that overall productivity was the same or better in employee-owned firms. 

Pérotin said: "In the UK, employee-owned firms such as John Lewis are making political as well as business headlines, with Labour and the Conservatives both recently proposing that some public services could be provided by companies owned and managed by their employees and other social enterprises. 

"But the success of John Lewis aside, there's generally a widespread view that because workers' co-operatives are managed by employees, they must be generally small, messy affairs that cannot possibly compete with 'real' businesses. There's evidence that companies which share some profit and capital with their employees perform at least as well as other companies in the UK and elsewhere, but we wanted to know whether businesses that are entirely owned and run by employees are as efficient as conventional firms. 

"In many ways, what we found goes against the image most people have of workers' co-operatives - in some industries, co-operatives are larger, on average, than conventional companies, and in all the industries we studied they invest at least as much.  Co-operatives also preserved jobs better during the 1990s recession. 

"Employee-owned firms are at least as productive as conventional businesses. In fact, in several industries we studied conventional firms could increase their effectiveness if they did things the co-operative way. For example, workers' co-operatives have less supervisors and managers than other businesses of the same size. In employee-owned companies, people don't just work hard, but are also interested in improving the way the business works-ultimately, it's their company." 

A copy of Productivity, capital and labour in labour-managed and conventional firms, is available on request. The paper is written by Fathi Fakhfakh of ERMES at Panthéon-Assas Paris II University, Virginie Pérotin of Leeds University Business School and Mόnica Gago, of Mondragon University, part of Mondragon Cooperative Corporation (MCC), which is thought to be the largest workers' co-operative in the world, with more than 100,000 employees worldwide. 

For more information

Professor Virginie Pérotin is available for interview. Contact the University of Leeds press office on 0113 343 4031, pressoffice@leeds.ac.uk

Notes to editors

Leeds University Business School is among the leading UK university-based business schools with a high reputation for research and a history of successful partnerships with industry and commerce at local, national and international levels.

Key facts include:

Leeds University Business School ranked in the UK's top 20 business schools and the world's top 100 schools.

Leeds University Business School ranked in UK top ten for Research (RAE 2008).

EQUIS and AMBA accredited.

CIPD accredited and ESRC recognised.

Members of the Faculty are at the forefront of major developments in basic and applied research across the fields of Business, Management, Accounting, Finance and Economics. Senior staff have held leadership positions and committee membership and advised major policy-making bodies and learned societies. These include the Academy of International Business, the Academy of Management, the Economic and Social Research Council's Training and Development and Research Grants Boards and the British Academy of Management.

Back to the top